Tuesday, 16 December 2025

 


Akharleni Arupulu Kekalu & Gola - `Akhanda -2’

(Review by S. Prabhakar)



 

There is a  हिंदी मुहावरा" बैल मुझे मार" (Aa bail mujhe maar) (which means inviting trouble to ourselves).    Going to a Balayya movie is nothing less than that.    Most of the Non Balayya fans (which includes me) very well know that we can hardly expect anything new or different from his movies.   Sometimes, though we know a movie (almost every movie of Balayya) could be bad, we still dare to check to see how bad it is.  In his entire career, there were 3-4 movies of Balayya which I could tolerate, and Akhanda-1 is one of them.   Going by Akhanda-1, that too the Akhanda role and the high hype given as saviour of Sanathana Dharma, I thought Boyapati-Balayya magic may work one more time.   But it is far from it and the die-hard Jai Balayya Brigade can only stomach whatever has been churned by Boyapati-Balayya combo. 

 

As a concept, the topic chosen is not bad -  Chinese joining hands with a corrupt politician whose father has lost power and son trying to grab power at any cost including dividing Hindus and making them lose faith in Hinduism (any resemblances to Rahul Gandhi is not a coincidence).  He lets loose a virus in Maha Khumb Mela and tries to shake the faith of Hindus by propagating that God has not come to their rescue and our Akhanda not only saves the anti-dot to the virus but also gives liberal sermons on Hindutva, Sanatana Dharma.   However, the execution falters, and there is hardly anything to hold the audience's attention.   Like Rajni movie directors, KGF and Sallar directors, Boyapati also suffers from his fixation on elevations.   How far can one be satisfied by stupid elevations, which are always larger than life and, beyond one point get on to your nerves.  



 

The good concept has not developed well due to a lack of depth in the story, poor dialogue writing,  and poor delivery by Balayya, full of stuttering, coupled with his brand of shouting and yelling without expressions or emotional depth in acting.   we cannot expect Balayya to deliver simple Telugu dialogue coherently; how can we expect him to deliver Sanskrit dialogue? He and Boyapati can only understand and appreciate, added to it the non-synchronisation of his dialogue delivery with body language and movement makes it a total cartoon caricature.   Earlier there was Krishna, who even after acting in over 300 movies, could never improve his still statue-like pose before the camera in a side angle, weak and shivering voice, funny facial expressions in the name of acting and now we have Balayya who has acted in over 100 movies but still could not develop proper synchronisation between his dialogue delivery and body language – the final effect is always like a poorly dubbed Chenese movies of late 70s.    



 

Everything is bad about Akhanda-2 and there is nothing to write positively about it.   Another fixation Boyapati has is that he has to show two Balayyas, whether required or not.    There is hardly any role or relevance of the first Balayya in the movie, but he has wasted a good part of the first half on him, going through routine motions and one dance with the female lead of less than half his age, who thankfully gets killed and saves us from any more romantic scenes or songs with robot-like moving Balayya.  

 

The opening with Chenese villains (played well by Bengali actor Saswat Chatterjee and Bhutani actor Sanjay Tsheltrim)  raised some hope which was dashed the moment the first Balayya enters.    The Maha Khumb mela scenes (looked to be originally shot at the Mahakhumbh Mela) looked good, but the rest of Leh Ladhakh, Amarnath are all probably shot with green screen and were poorly executed.   Hope of movie picking up after the entry of Akhanda also did not happen with mindless elevations, ear-splitting loud dialogue delivery and the Boyapati Balayya patented curse and abusive words.  What could be more ridiculous than showing PM, HM, NIA helpless and instead of falling back on our powerful defence forces, hoping and praying that an Aghora will come and rescue the country.    I read somewhere that Boyapati and Balayya have screened some scenes to Yogi Adityanath and are saying that PM has shown interest in the movie and they are planning to show it to PM also.  He will split his hair if he sees such scenes and our Balayya acting.

The CAG are of pathetic quality, especially the backdrop of icy mountains, the gun battles and blasts are elementary and look like what we saw in movies in the 1990s.  All the scenes involving Adi Pinisetty were horribly handled; the scenes of SVR as a black magician in 70-year-old Patala Bhairavi look far better than in this movie.   Adi Pinisetti is completely wasted.  Thaman, the music director, as always, is loud; he could not use the Sanskrit slokas well as background music.     Someone like Keeravani could have done justice.   The seasoned action directors Ram Laxman did a pathetic job, showing throughout the movie with a trishul in hand Balayya faceing hundreds of Chinese army men with AK-47 and making a dozen fly in the air and bounce like a football on Balayya thumping his leg or trishul on the earth.  What better can they do when they have to handle a 65-year-old bulky hero.     Normally, people say when you go to a Boyapati-Balayya combo movie, you should leave your brain and rational thinking at home, but it seems both of them kept their brains in a deep freezer at home while going for the shooting of Akhanda-2, Boyapati, as a director, has been a complete let-down.



 

Overall, an average movie, which is being dubbed as a blockbuster in 4 days.   Today, in the afternoon show in Delhi, there were 12 people in a theatre with a capacity of over 350 seats.  As MLN says in Aagadu, flop movie directors hold more success meets.   I am absolutely shocked to listen to Gangadhara Shastry, pravachana karta,  going gaga about Boyapati and Balayya as Karanajanmulu to have made this movie.    As if Telugu is not enough, it has been released in many languages, including Hindi and Boyapati and Balayya made buffoons of themselves by their murderous Hindi in road shows in Mumbai.   After many decades wait, with the efforts of directors like Rajamouli, Kanaga Raj and Prashant Neel a pan-India market has been created, but if movies like OG and Akhanda-2 are released in theatres, the PAN India audience will lose interest in Telugu and South movies.   In the interest of PAN India movies, Boyapati, Balayya, and Pawan Kalyan should spare the North audience.   



 

Non-Balayya fans are cautioned to stay away from this movie, even on OTT release.   As far as `Jai Balayya Brigade’ is concerned, they have a lot to lap up and cheer and shout Jai Balayya in theatres (preferably single screen) till their vocal cords pain. 

 

S. Prabhakar

16.12.2025

 

 

 

 

 


Sunday, 14 December 2025

 


Review of Dulquer Salmaan’s Tamil/Telugu movie Kaantha (available multilingual on Netflix)



Dulquer Salmaan’s latest Tamil/Telugu movie `Kaantha’ is an interesting thriller murder mystery with the backdrop of the Tamil industry of the 1950s, with claims of family members of its being loosely based on the biography of the star of the Tamil Industry in the early 1950s M. K. Thyagaraja Bhagavathar.  It traces the ego clashes and one-upmanship between an established director played by Samuthirakani and an upcoming star played by Dulquer and the debutant heroine, played by Bhagyashree, caught in the crossfire between the two giants.   The type of clash the director and rising star had, the director not tolerating the interference of the star and the star was more bothered about his image and how the public would perceive his role and interfering in the work of the director.   The show down going to the extent of the star trying to throw the director out of the movie and he himself taking charge to finish the movie and unsuccessful attempt by the director to harm the hero by attempts on his life.   The South Indian audience can relate this fictional story to MGR, NTR, ANR, Shivaji, growing larger than life and directors finding it difficult to tailor-make their scripts suiting to their images.  

The slow-moving plot picks up and becomes racy after the murder of the heroine and the entry of Rana as the investigating officer.    The needle of suspicion keeps moving from one person to another, present in the studio, including the hero and the director and others outside the studio but related to the hero.  Even after the culprit is revealed the movie ends with an unexpected but interesting twist.   



Dulquer has once again put in an excellent performance; he impresses more and more with each outing.   It’s a challenging role for a young actor to reprise the role of a hero of the 1950s, the body language, the acting style of those days etc.   The Telugu audience will recollect his role of Gameni Ganeshan in Mahanati. Whenever people criticise and condemn the nepo kids, one should remember stars like Dulquer (son of Malayalam top star Mammootty), Ranbir, who, despite being labelled as nepo kids, put their best performances and proved themselves on their merit.    Samuthirakani too gave a powerful performance as an egoistic director who expects everyone, including top stars follow his commands like school-going kids.   Bhagyashree was refreshing and innocent as per the demands of the role.   Though with limited talent, Rana does well in support roles and is slowly proving to be like Akshey Khanna of the Telugu industry.  

Overall, an interesting thriller, and not a run of mills movies, and I give 4 out of 5, 0.5 for Dulqer's super performance in a challenging role.

 

S. Prabhakar

14.12.25

Saturday, 6 December 2025

 

Review of Hindi movie `Dhurandhar'

By

S Prabhakar




There was a positive pre-release buzz before the release of Hindi movie Dhurandhar, apart from a big assembly of the star cast, it has references to many terrorist attacks like the Kandahar hijack, the Mumbai attack and the Parliament attack, Ajit Doval's strategies, etc., which made me watch a Hindi movie in a theatre.

Dhurandhar is a well-made spy thriller in great detail.    The highlight of the movie is perfect casting and the bold manner liberal references are made to Pakistan, the Baloch politics,  ISI, Presidents of Pakistan, ISI chiefs, heads of Terrorist outfits.   Throughout the movie, there are backdrops of Pakistan and direct references made about the infamous terrorist attacks and their celebrations on the other side in Pakistan.  

One of the very few movies in recent times in which many actors have put their best performances:

·       The makeover of R Mahadevan as Ajit Doval and his restrained performance were at their best.  A gifted actor who gives his best whenever he gets an opportunity



·       Akhey Khanna, the most underrated but brilliant actor of the Hindi film industry, has once again stolen the thunder.   Though he was looking a bit weak and sick, he has gone into the skin of the character and brought out all shades brilliantly.   Like his father Vinod Khanna, he may not be able to carry a movie on his shoulder, but he gives his best in multi-starrers and stands tall



·       Ranvit Singh, though many times he tired us with his overacting, loud and lousy acting style, has given a controlled, restrained performance in this movie.   Like Samson it may be something to do with long hair and beard. Whenever he sports long locks like in Padmavat, he puts up his best performance.    He is excellent as an Indian spy who has infiltrated the terrorist outfits in Pakistan and become a trusted lieutenant before bumping off a dreaded terrorist.  

·       Sanjay Dutt, though he looked tired and worn out,  has an extended cameo and is good

·       Sara is cute and confident

·       The surprise package has been Rakesh Bedi, whom we have known as a decent comedian for decades.   He got a meaty role in a Hindi movie for the first time in his career, and he is brilliant in every shade of a crooked politician character.

·       Arjun Rampal had a small role of a menacing ISI chief; his emotions have been drowned in a heavy bearded make-up.   I expected a far better and better defined role for such a character in the movie.  

Aditya Dhar's writing is good, raising a lot of raw pent-up patriotic feelings and as a director has got the best out of most of the cast.   But he has failed in editing; scenes were not crisp and kept dragging.  Over 220 minutes of duration is tiring and tests the patience of the audience.   He has gone into OTT mode, breaking the movie into chapter-wise and seems to be in no hurry to make the narrative racy.   After this length of movie also, only the first part is covered, and there is more to come, indicating that all the episodes of `Ghar main jus kar marenge’ will be covered in the second part.  

Going by the present trends and bad precedents set by Telugu and Tamil movies, there is an extreme and overdose of violence not easy for everyone to digest.   Music and BGM are very average, for most part of the movie old super hit Hindi songs have been used, which beyond one point become stale and repetitive.   BGM in Hindi movies specially action movies, needs a lot of improvement to catch up with DSP (Pushpa 1 and 2) , Keeravani (Bahubali 1, 2 and RRR) and Anirudh (Coolie and Jailer) and Taman S to elevate the action scenes.  

Overall, a movie worth watching in theatres, provided you have the patience to sit through over 3 ½ hour-long movie with a 2-hour pre-interval.    Hope it does well at the box office and revives the commercial movies of Hindi

S. Prabhakar

6.12.2025